<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://41loveletters.com/1934/08/19/letter-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://41loveletters.com/1934/08/19/letter-10/</link>
	<description>R. H. Swinney to Ruth Erlanger, 1934</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://41loveletters.com/1934/08/19/letter-10/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.43loveletters.com/1934/08/19/letter-10/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[1] Might be worth mentioning that &lt;i&gt;The Story of San Michele&lt;/i&gt; is the autobiography of a doctor, and that it was a world-wide bestseller -- in 1930, just a year after its publication, it was going into its 17th American edition --translated into over 40 languages.  Both aspects seem germane to Harold&#039;s reading it -- the former for obvious reasons, and the latter I suppose just to contextualize it for modern readers. I should think it was the &lt;i&gt;Da Vinci Code&lt;/i&gt; of its day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[1] Might be worth mentioning that <i>The Story of San Michele</i> is the autobiography of a doctor, and that it was a world-wide bestseller &#8212; in 1930, just a year after its publication, it was going into its 17th American edition &#8211;translated into over 40 languages.  Both aspects seem germane to Harold&#8217;s reading it &#8212; the former for obvious reasons, and the latter I suppose just to contextualize it for modern readers. I should think it was the <i>Da Vinci Code</i> of its day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

